MCKEE RD-BARKLEY#1 over CAMP RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+40.89788, -80.1698040°53'52" N, 80°10'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | MCKEE RD-BARKLEY#1 over CAMP RUN |
| Structure number: | 377207052410010 |
| Location: | 207001 NEAR T-353 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1913 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 74.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $338,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 72.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $338,000 |