TWP RD 386 CTY#20 over MAHONING CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.99354, -76.6187940°59'37" N, 76°37'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | TWP RD 386 CTY#20 over MAHONING CREEK |
| Structure number: | 477208038600200 |
| Location: | 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF LR 505 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Total length: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1913 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 43 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Imminent Failure [1 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 30.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 43 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 13.9 tons [12.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $444,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 43 [as of 1991] |
| Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
| Operating rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 13.9 tons [12.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 23.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $270,000 |