Share:

WOODHAVEN ROAD over THORNTON ROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.09929, -74.98673
40°05'57" N, 74°59'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WOODHAVEN ROAD over THORNTON ROAD
Structure number:000000000038431
Old structure number:670063003200000 (from 1992 edition)
Location:EAST OF ROUTE 1 3373C05
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:75.1 ft. [22.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:103.0 ft. [31.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Year reconstructed:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:49,126 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:96.7 tons [87.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.8 tons [36.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.0
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201489.0Not deficientGoodFairGood49126
February 201285.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood24842
March 201085.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood33283
March 200885.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood33210
March 200685.7Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood64241
February 200469.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor62726
February 200267.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor63800
August 199983.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodFair64378