BUSTLETON AVENUE over PENNYPACK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.07664, -75.0445640°04'36" N, 75°02'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | BUSTLETON AVENUE over PENNYPACK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 671009014006340 |
| Location: | 2MILES S.WELSH RD. 19D02 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
| Total length: | 229.0 ft. [69.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 66.3 ft. [20.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 89.2 ft. [27.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1969 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,282 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 67.9 tons [61.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 39.9 tons [36.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 74.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 27,237 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 63.4 tons [57.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 68.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,847,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 27,144 [as of 1992] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 63.4 tons [57.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 86.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $503,000 |