HENRY AVENUE over SEPTA;CSX AND CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.00733, -75.1796540°00'26" N, 75°10'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | HENRY AVENUE over SEPTA;CSX AND CREEK |
| Structure number: | 674001002005880 |
| Location: | N.HUNTING PARK AVE.28D02 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 92.9 ft. [28.3 m] |
| Total length: | 562.0 ft. [171.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 96.5 ft. [29.4 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 99° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Girder and floorbeam system [03] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,561 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $4,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 16,069 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 44.3 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $4,222,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 22,086 [as of 1992] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Operating rating: | 89.1 tons [81.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.7 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $7,334,000 |