Share:

ROBERTS AVE.W.B. over ROOSEVELT BLVD.RAMP M NB

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.01913, -75.16403
40°01'09" N, 75°09'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROBERTS AVE.W.B. over ROOSEVELT BLVD.RAMP M NB
Structure number:000000000039071
Old structure number:674009002112830 (from 1992 edition)
Location:AT ROOSEVELT BLVD 3480D08
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Total length:151.9 ft. [46.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:43°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Year reconstructed:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,289 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:70.8 tons [64.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201480.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair10289
March 201280.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9951
March 201080.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9977
February 200881.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9955
March 200693.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9155
March 200493.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8939
February 200293.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9397
October 199993.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9039
October 199792.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5573
November 199583.0Not deficientGoodFairSatisfactory5325
April 199494.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5200
April 199279.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryGood4998
May 199079.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood4830