Ashburner Street over AMTRAK (NE CORRIDOR)


+40.03812, -75.01262
40°02'17" N, 75°00'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Ashburner Street over AMTRAK (NE CORRIDOR)
Structure number:000000000039220
Old structure number:677301013000510 (from 1992 edition)
Location:W of State Road 19J09
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1939
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,300 [as of 1988]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:52.8 tons [48.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201492.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 201292.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 201092.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 200892.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 200692.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 200476.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 200277.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
October 200080.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 199880.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood5300
August 199698.5Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good5300
August 199497.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good5300
November 199297.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good5300
September 199032.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair2900