Linden Avenue over AMTRAK (NE CORRIDOR)


+40.04726, -74.99632
40°02'50" N, 74°59'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Linden Avenue over AMTRAK (NE CORRIDOR)
Structure number:000000000039228
Old structure number:677301015003200 (from 1992 edition)
Location:W of State Rd 20A08
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Total length:123.0 ft. [37.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,500 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:101.8 tons [92.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.3
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$2,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201592.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood13500
August 201492.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good13500
January 201367.0Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorGood13500
August 201089.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
August 200891.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
August 200691.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
August 200476.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
August 200276.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
October 200076.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
August 199876.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12300
August 199695.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent12300
August 199449.2Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor9500
August 199249.2Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor9500
August 199049.2Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor9500