67th Street over AMTRAK (NE Corridor)


+39.89293, -75.24388
39°53'35" N, 75°14'38" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:67th Street over AMTRAK (NE Corridor)
Structure number:000000000039258
Old structure number:677301025003990 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S.PASCHALL AVE. 36F05
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,450 [as of 1979]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201492.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 201292.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 201092.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 200892.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 200673.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 200473.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 200277.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 200079.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 199879.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 199694.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 199494.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood2450
January 199291.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent2450
January 199091.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent2450