Share:

RAMP ND(NB)OFF over REED STREET,OPEN GROUND

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.93009, -75.14613
39°55'48" N, 75°08'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP ND(NB)OFF over REED STREET,OPEN GROUND
Structure number:000000000039279
Old structure number:678007001000000 (from 1992 edition)
Location:REED ST.INTERCHG.3700G02
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Total length:609.0 ft. [185.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:9.2 ft. [2.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,879 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:99.8 tons [90.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.9 tons [31.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201493.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9879
February 201293.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8942
March 201093.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood6453
April 200890.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood134
June 200691.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood131
June 200494.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood128
April 200295.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood123
May 200095.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood120
June 199895.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good118