+18.17000, -66.86500
18°10'12" N, 66°51'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:PR 128 over PRIETO RIVER
Structure number:002611
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:29.5 ft. [9.0 m]
Total length:107.0 ft. [32.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1924
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2]
Operating rating:16.1 tons [14.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:9.6 tons [8.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:4.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$390,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 20174.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious500
November 20154.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious500
October 20144.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious500
October 20134.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious500
August 20124.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious500
February 20124.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious500
August 200923.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
December 200763.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair500
August 200644.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair300
December 200443.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair500
December 200244.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
April 200044.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
August 199851.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory300
February 199652.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory300
December 199351.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory441
March 199245.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory300