OFF PR 123 over GRANDE DE ARECIBO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+18.21833, -66.7266718°13'06" N, 66°43'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | OFF PR 123 over GRANDE DE ARECIBO RIVER |
| Structure number: | 013551 |
| Location: | 6 KM SOUTH OF UTUADO |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Total length: | 174.9 ft. [53.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1967 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 10 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 250 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 52.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $149,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
| Average daily traffic: | 250 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 13.9 tons [12.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 17.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $718,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
| Average daily traffic: | 420 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $27,000 |