+18.18667, -66.98333
18°11'12" N, 66°58'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CONN PR 120 TO 357 over MARICAO RIVER
Structure number:022081
Location:CONNECTOR PR120 TO PR357
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Total length:59.4 ft. [18.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,200 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:57.9 tons [52.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.9 tons [31.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$34,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201573.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4200
August 201373.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4200
September 201173.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4200
August 200973.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4200
December 200773.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4200
August 200673.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4200
December 200473.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4200
July 200273.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1000
March 200073.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1000
April 199873.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1000
May 199673.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1000
November 199473.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1000
December 199273.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1000
August 199177.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood900