US 301 over S. EDISTO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+33.33868, -81.0179733°20'19" N, 81°01'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | US 301 over S. EDISTO RIVER |
| Structure number: | 000520030130400 |
| Location: | 3MI N OF BAMBERG |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
| Length of largest span: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Total length: | 613.9 ft. [187.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 39.4 ft. [12.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1952 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1973 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 25 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,100 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 52.5 tons [47.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $900,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,900 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 52.8 tons [48.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.8 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $396,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,406 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $396,000 |