Share:

FAU 3556 over CHICKAMAUGA CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.04833, -85.21417
35°02'54" N, 85°12'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 3556 over CHICKAMAUGA CREEK
Structure number:33035560007
Location:2 MI SW OF SR 153
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:125.0 ft. [38.1 m]
Total length:500.0 ft. [152.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:79.1 ft. [24.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2012
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,500 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.4

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201589.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good22500
June 201389.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good22500
November 201289.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good22500
June 201142.5Structurally deficientSeriousFairFair22500
June 200931.2Structurally deficientSeriousFairFair22500
August 200743.7Structurally deficientSeriousFairFair22500
May 200543.7Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryFair22500
July 200343.7Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryFair22500
June 200143.7Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryFair24860
May 199943.7Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryFair20790
July 199759.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory22200
June 199568.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21970
May 199368.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21700
June 199155.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair19010