NFA C596 over PITTS BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+35.18306, -85.2500035°10'59" N, 85°15'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | NFA C596 over PITTS BRANCH |
| Structure number: | 330C5960001 |
| Location: | .2 MI WEST OF SR 153 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Total length: | 48.2 ft. [14.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 12° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 120 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.4 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $131,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 120 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 52.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $197,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 600 [as of 1978] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $93,000 |