FAP 29NB RP TO SR8 over SR-29 EX RP / SR-8


+35.07667, -85.32000
35°04'36" N, 85°19'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAP 29NB RP TO SR8 over SR-29 EX RP / SR-8
Structure number:33FA0271011
Location:JCT OF SR 8-SR 29
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Total length:166.0 ft. [50.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.2 ft. [15.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.3 ft. [6.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2013
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,500 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.3 tons [62.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:98.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201498.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3500
December 201288.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
December 201089.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
January 200993.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
January 200793.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
February 200593.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
December 200293.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
December 200082.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood36650
November 199881.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood39780
December 199774.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryGood36620
December 199651.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood36620
June 199551.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood36710
April 199351.9Not deficientFairGoodGood36120
October 199058.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood25080