FAU 3603 over POE BRANCH


+35.06389, -85.15694
35°03'50" N, 85°09'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 3603 over POE BRANCH
Structure number:33M36030003
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,080 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$296,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201570.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood6080
June 201371.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood6080
June 201165.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood6080
May 200965.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood6080
June 200770.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood6080
May 200570.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood4850
May 200370.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood4850
May 200171.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood7760
May 199969.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5020
August 199767.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood4590
April 199568.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2130
May 199368.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3500
June 199168.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3920