FAU 319 over NORTH CHICKAMAUGA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.14889, -85.2188935°08'56" N, 85°13'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 319 over NORTH CHICKAMAUGA CREEK |
| Structure number: | 33S43060011 |
| Location: | 1.94 MI. E OF SR-153 JCT. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
| Total length: | 273.0 ft. [83.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1955 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1990 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 7 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 26,940 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.7 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 23,740 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.9 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 23,300 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 63.4 tons [57.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.9 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $573,000 |