FAU 17 over CHICKAMAUGA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.08000, -85.2188935°04'48" N, 85°13'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 17 over CHICKAMAUGA CREEK |
| Structure number: | 33SR0580013 |
| Location: | 0.72 MI. W OF SR-153 JCT. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 162.1 ft. [49.4 m] |
| Total length: | 420.0 ft. [128.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.3 ft. [13.2 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1929 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,420 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 58.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $5,644,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 19,030 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,567,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15,800 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 76.2 tons [69.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,008,000 |