Share:

FAP 153 over SR 58

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.08222, -85.20611
35°04'56" N, 85°12'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAP 153 over SR 58
Structure number:33SR0580017
Location:SR153 & SR58 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:175.9 ft. [53.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:124.0 ft. [37.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:19°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:2004
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:71,520 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.5

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201592.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood71520
April 201392.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood66970
April 201184.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood76000
April 200984.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood72320
March 200784.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood74660
April 200586.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood74070
July 200486.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood67890
April 200352.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair80880
March 200148.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair71230
February 199948.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair77990
May 199755.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair65230
March 199562.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory66790
March 199362.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory62140
February 199170.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodSatisfactory59170