FAU 3588 SBL over SR 153


+35.13083, -85.24472
35°07'51" N, 85°14'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 3588 SBL over SR 153
Structure number:33SR1530030
Location:2.4 MI.N.OF TN. RV.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:184.1 ft. [56.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:23°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1954
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:29,850 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:83.2 tons [75.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$751,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201562.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29850
April 201362.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29850
April 201162.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29850
April 200962.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29850
March 200762.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29850
April 200559.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair30630
April 200359.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair31110
March 200157.5Structurally deficientPoorFairFair30170
February 199956.4Structurally deficientSeriousFairFair30730
May 199753.8Structurally deficientSeriousFairFair30770
March 199565.5Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood31430
March 199366.1Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood26000
February 199159.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood25940