FAS 69 over DOE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.38722, -88.1972235°23'14" N, 88°11'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAS 69 over DOE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 36SR0690035 |
| Location: | NEAR SALTILLO |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Total length: | 233.9 ft. [71.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1944 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1995 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,003,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 450 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $551,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 450 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $422,000 |