FAU 1124 (SA 4729) over WILLIAMS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.97000, -83.8822235°58'12" N, 83°52'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 1124 (SA 4729) over WILLIAMS CREEK |
| Structure number: | 47004780005 |
| Location: | RIVERSIDE DR-AT CITY LMTS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.7 ft. [12.4 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1925 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,020 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $529,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,580 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $209,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,400 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 74.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $69,000 |