FAU 5662 over WILLIAMS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.97500, -83.8866735°58'30" N, 83°53'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 5662 over WILLIAMS CREEK |
| Structure number: | 470A0330001 |
| Location: | IN KNOXVILLE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Total length: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
| Skew angle: | 10° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 2007 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,780 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.6 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,000 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $187,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,000 [as of 1978] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $47,000 |