Share:

FAU 5667 over BRANCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.94222, -84.01028
35°56'32" N, 84°00'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 5667 over BRANCH
Structure number:470A0690001
Location:N OF I40-NEAR PAPERMILL R
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,420 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$214,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201480.4Functionally obsolete---5420
May 201272.8Functionally obsolete---5420
April 201072.8Functionally obsolete---5420
May 200872.8Functionally obsolete---5420
April 200672.8Functionally obsolete---5420
May 200472.8Functionally obsolete---5420
April 200268.8Functionally obsolete---5420
March 200069.4Functionally obsolete---990
June 199869.4Functionally obsolete---990
May 199667.4Functionally obsolete---990
June 199467.4Functionally obsolete---990
March 199267.4Functionally obsolete---990
May 199067.4Functionally obsolete---990