Share:

NFA A317 over FOURTH CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.92417, -83.99750
35°55'27" N, 83°59'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NFA A317 over FOURTH CREEK
Structure number:470A3170001
Location:W OFF SR332(NORTHSHORE DR
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Total length:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:61.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$130,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201461.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
June 201261.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
June 201061.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
June 200850.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
January 200850.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
June 200659.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
May 200459.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair100
May 200244.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory100
May 200049.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory100
June 199849.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory100
May 199648.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory100
June 199452.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory100
March 199252.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory100
May 199052.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory100