Share:

I75 RL&LL over I75 /SR-9 (CLINTON HWY)

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.99833, -83.96000
35°59'54" N, 83°57'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I75 RL&LL over I75 /SR-9 (CLINTON HWY)
Structure number:47I00750025
Location:AT SHARPS GAP EXCHANGE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Total length:180.1 ft. [54.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1981
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:78,270 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:70.3 tons [63.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:87.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201587.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood78270
January 201387.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood74180
January 201187.8Not deficientExcellentGoodGood72910
April 200888.6Not deficientExcellentGoodGood66550
January 200776.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood78870
December 200478.7Not deficientExcellentGoodGood80050
March 200379.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood74850
February 200178.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood66150
December 199878.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood67980
February 199784.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood64800
January 199584.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood62030
January 199386.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood47800
November 199086.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood47800