FAU 3789 over RL-HEISKELL AVE. / I275

Map 

Facts 

Name:	FAU 3789 over RL-HEISKELL AVE. / I275
Structure number:	47I02750011
Location:	0.6 MI S. OF SHARPS GAP
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:	55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:	273.3 ft. [83.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	47.2 ft. [14.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:	24°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1959
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:	6
Main spans material:	Concrete [1]
Main spans design:	Tee beam [04]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	11,480 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	74.3
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:	$2,213,000

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	16,150 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:	48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	91.4

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	16,060 [as of 1991]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:	Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6]
Operating rating:	48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:	48.2
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:	$779,000

Comments