Share:

FAU 3789 LL over LL-HEISKELL AVE. / I275

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.99139, -83.95167
35°59'29" N, 83°57'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 3789 LL over LL-HEISKELL AVE. / I275
Structure number:47I02750012
Location:0.6 MI S. OF SHARPS GAP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:273.3 ft. [83.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.2 ft. [14.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,480 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,845,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201474.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair11480
December 201274.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair11480
January 201174.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair11480
December 200874.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory11480
November 200656.0Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory16030
November 200456.0Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory15990
September 200291.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory16960
September 200089.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18320
December 199891.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory16150
September 199691.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12690
December 199491.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15210
October 199391.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15400
August 199263.1Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory16060
October 199063.1Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory16060