FAP 115 over SR115 /SR158&TENN. RIV.


+35.94556, -83.94694
35°56'44" N, 83°56'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAP 115 over SR115 /SR158&TENN. RIV.
Structure number:47SR1150009
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:323.2 ft. [98.5 m]
Total length:1179.5 ft. [359.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:136.2 ft. [41.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:52,370 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Pier/abutment protection:None present but re-evaluation suggested [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$58,126,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201679.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood52370
January 201479.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood56930
January 201279.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood55800
January 201079.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood58660
May 200880.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood57410
March 200681.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood55400
March 200481.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood54180
December 200181.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood56100
December 199983.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood57520
April 199883.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood52830
November 199581.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood48050
June 199481.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood46490
February 199281.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood52170
October 199030.4Structurally deficientPoorFairFair52170