FAP 71 over TN R-A132-SOURR-FAU1124
Map
Coordinates:
+35.96083, -83.8969435°57'39" N, 83°53'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAP 71 over TN R-A132-SOURR-FAU1124 |
| Structure number: | 47X00710001 |
| Location: | S. KNOXVILLE BLVD. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 390.1 ft. [118.9 m] |
| Total length: | 1899.0 ft. [578.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 118.1 ft. [36.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1983 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,100 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 72.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $74,621,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Average daily traffic: | 2,580 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Evaluation: | Not applicable [N] |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,300 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 95.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $8,261,000 |