NFA D136 over JAMES RD.


+35.20000, -89.86472
35°12'00" N, 89°51'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:NFA D136 over JAMES RD.
Structure number:79028150007
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:150 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$769,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201579.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood150
April 201379.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood150
May 201179.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood150
June 200979.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood150
September 200778.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood150
September 200580.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood150
October 200383.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood150
October 200157.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood14350
March 200057.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood14350
June 199857.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood14350
November 199559.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood14350
October 199359.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood14350
December 199159.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood14350