FAU 2822 297489W over CNIC RAILROAD


+35.21639, -90.02361
35°12'59" N, 90°01'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 2822 297489W over CNIC RAILROAD
Structure number:79028220001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:183.1 ft. [55.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,540 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:43.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$4,163,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201543.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor6540
April 201346.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor6540
May 201146.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor6540
June 200962.3Not deficientFairFairFair6540
October 200762.3Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair6540
September 200561.0Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair7700
October 200360.2Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair8400
October 200141.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor10400
March 200043.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor8440
June 199842.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor10850
November 199568.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair8540
October 199381.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8400
December 199181.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8190