+35.07667, -89.94139
35°04'36" N, 89°56'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 5029 over TEN MILE CREEK
Structure number:79028700001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Total length:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:76.8 ft. [23.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,060 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$466,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201576.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood12060
April 201376.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12060
May 201176.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12060
June 200975.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12060
November 200775.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood12060
October 200574.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood18760
October 200374.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood17680
November 200176.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood14080
March 200075.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood18000
May 199875.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood17550
June 199876.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood12500
December 199578.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory13900
October 199378.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory12950
December 199178.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory15600