FAU 4015 over BRANCH


+35.23722, -89.91333
35°14'14" N, 89°54'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 4015 over BRANCH
Structure number:79040150003
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Total length:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,780 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32]
Estimated cost of work:$935,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201566.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7780
April 201366.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7780
May 201166.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7780
July 200966.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood7780
October 200766.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood7780
October 200566.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood7680
October 200365.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood8520
November 200166.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood7620
March 200066.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7130
May 199868.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7190
June 199869.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6950
December 199554.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory6550
October 199354.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory5510
December 199157.5Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory4620