Share:

FAU 5081 over DRAINAGE DITCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.02500, -90.04861
35°01'30" N, 90°02'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 5081 over DRAINAGE DITCH
Structure number:790A7660001
Location:HODGE RD - MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,970 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:68.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$451,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201568.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor3970
April 201368.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor3970
May 201168.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor3970
June 200984.6Not deficientFairFairFair3970
November 200784.6Not deficientFairFairFair3970
October 200584.7Not deficientFairFairFair3250
October 200384.6Not deficientFairFairFair3750
November 200166.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair4350
March 200068.4Structurally deficientFairPoorFair4320
May 199868.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair5200
June 199885.4Not deficientGoodGoodFair5500
December 199584.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair5900
September 199384.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair5450
December 199185.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3000