FAU 5102 over BRANCH


+35.22028, -90.01472
35°13'13" N, 90°00'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 5102 over BRANCH
Structure number:790B1160001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.4 ft. [17.2 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,210 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$671,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201577.2Not deficientFairFairGood2210
April 201377.2Not deficientFairFairGood2210
May 201177.2Not deficientFairFairGood2210
June 200977.2Not deficientFairFairGood2210
November 200777.2Not deficientFairFairGood2210
October 200578.2Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood2380
November 200378.2Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood2470
November 200178.2Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood2820
April 200078.1Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood3220
May 199878.2Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood2700
June 199889.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood3600
December 199578.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3500
September 199378.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3600
December 199178.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair100