FAU 177 over BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+35.05667, -89.8127835°03'24" N, 89°48'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 177 over BRANCH |
| Structure number: | 790B2930001 |
| Location: | 2.6 MI S OF SR-57 JCT. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.8 ft. [10.3 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1957 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
| Deck type: | Other [9] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,460 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 29.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $728,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,260 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $287,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,400 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 56.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $108,000 |