+35.06167, -89.89111
35°03'42" N, 89°53'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 5012 over JOHNS CREEK
Structure number:790B5590005
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:74.5 ft. [22.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,140 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:56.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$703,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201556.7Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory19140
April 201373.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory19140
May 201166.2Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory19140
June 200979.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19140
November 200779.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19140
October 200568.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22250
October 200368.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair23330
November 200152.1Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor20850
March 200052.1Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor20580
June 199851.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor21960
January 199683.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21510
September 199384.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30
December 199184.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory100