FAU 5089 over BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+35.04278, -90.0866735°02'34" N, 90°05'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 5089 over BRANCH |
| Structure number: | 790B5700001 |
| Location: | LEVI RD - MEMPHIS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Total length: | 96.1 ft. [29.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1958 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,790 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.3 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $368,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,160 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 56.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $263,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,120 [as of 1978] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $203,000 |