FAU 5089 over BRANCH


+35.04278, -90.08667
35°02'34" N, 90°05'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 5089 over BRANCH
Structure number:790B5700001
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Total length:96.1 ft. [29.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,790 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:65.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$473,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201565.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6790
April 201365.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6790
May 201165.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6790
June 200965.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory6790
November 200765.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory6790
October 200554.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair6730
October 200354.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair7040
November 200153.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair9800
April 200055.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair9430
May 199856.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair8160
June 199874.7Not deficientFairGoodGood2700
December 199560.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2800
September 199316.2Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2750
December 199175.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1120