+35.08667, -89.93222
35°05'12" N, 89°55'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU B200 over BLACK BAYOU
Structure number:790B6220001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,860 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$313,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201569.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6860
April 201369.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6860
May 201169.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6860
June 200969.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6860
November 200769.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6860
October 200569.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6650
October 200369.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7390
November 200169.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8160
April 200069.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7820
May 199872.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood4000
June 199871.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood4950
December 199579.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4450
September 199377.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7200
December 199179.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4000