FAU 5042 over TEN MILE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.04417, -89.9166735°02'39" N, 89°55'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAU 5042 over TEN MILE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 790B9800001 |
| Location: | HUNGERFORD RD - MEMPHIS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Total length: | 73.2 ft. [22.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,070 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 24% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 70.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $985,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,450 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 24% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 60.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $358,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 93.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $114,000 |