NFA E945 over BRANCH


+35.08250, -90.06806
35°04'57" N, 90°04'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:NFA E945 over BRANCH
Structure number:790E9450001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.7 ft. [11.8 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:640 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:46.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$209,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201546.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory640
May 201352.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory640
June 201152.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory640
August 200952.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory640
November 200773.1Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory640
November 200573.1Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory640
November 200373.1Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory640
December 200175.7Not applicableFairFairSatisfactory400
April 200075.7Not applicableFairFairSatisfactory400
April 199847.1Not applicableFairSeriousSatisfactory400
June 199888.3Not applicableSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory400
January 199688.3Not applicableSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory400
October 199489.0Not applicableSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory400