FAU 5031 over BRANCH


+35.05639, -89.92194
35°03'23" N, 89°55'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 5031 over BRANCH
Structure number:790M0020001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,220 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$205,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201562.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5220
April 201370.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5220
May 201170.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5220
June 200970.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5220
November 200770.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5220
October 200570.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5120
October 200370.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5190
November 200168.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6670
April 200070.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5630
May 199865.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8700
June 199866.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8350
December 199565.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory9300
September 199366.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory8500
December 199169.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory6020