FAU 4191 over DAYS CREEK


+35.06083, -89.99361
35°03'39" N, 89°59'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 4191 over DAYS CREEK
Structure number:790M0840003
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:171.9 ft. [52.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:13,590 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:22.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$6,215,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201522.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor13590
April 201320.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor17710
May 201120.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor17710
June 200937.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor17710
October 200737.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor17710
October 200536.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor18940
October 200364.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory18560
November 200151.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory22130
March 200051.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21990
May 199851.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory22190
June 199851.3Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory23100
December 199589.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22140
October 199389.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19350
December 199189.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22000