Share:

NFA G642 over HURRICANE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.03694, -89.96694
35°02'13" N, 89°58'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NFA G642 over HURRICANE CREEK
Structure number:790X0060001
Location:RUNWAY RD - MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Total length:104.0 ft. [31.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:62.7 ft. [19.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,660 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:78.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,541,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201578.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood1660
May 201367.0Not deficientGoodFairGood1660
June 201167.0Not deficientGoodFairGood1660
August 200966.0Not deficientGoodFairGood1660
November 200767.0Not deficientGoodFairGood1660
November 200551.0Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood1660
November 200350.0Not deficientGoodPoorGood1660
December 200151.3Not deficientGoodPoorGood1000
April 200052.3Not deficientGoodPoorGood1000
April 199885.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1000
February 199685.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1000