NFA E721 over OLIVE AVE / I-55


+35.11056, -90.07500
35°06'38" N, 90°04'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:NFA E721 over OLIVE AVE / I-55
Structure number:79I00550081
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:111.9 ft. [34.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.7 ft. [13.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:280 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,037,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201575.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory280
February 201375.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory280
March 201175.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory280
April 200987.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood280
June 200783.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood280
August 200526.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood280
August 200374.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood280
September 200171.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood280
January 200071.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood280
June 199883.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood100
September 199587.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood50
August 199387.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood30
November 199187.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood100