FAP 3 over SR-3 / I-240 & RAMPS


+35.07111, -90.02111
35°04'16" N, 90°01'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAP 3 over SR-3 / I-240 & RAMPS
Structure number:79I00550109
Location:EAST OF I240 & I55 INT.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Total length:268.1 ft. [81.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1998
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,860 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$4,241,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201787.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17860
March 201588.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16730
February 201388.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17370
April 201188.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16130
May 200986.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood20320
August 200786.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood20480
August 200590.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood22710
September 200389.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood23950
July 200186.1Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood25990
February 20000.0Not applicable---56600
January 199859.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory26480