Share:

I-240SB 348605B over I-240 EB / AGNES PL & RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.12528, -90.02472
35°07'31" N, 90°01'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-240SB 348605B over I-240 EB / AGNES PL & RR
Structure number:79I02400035
Location:0.38 MI S OF SR-4 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Total length:586.0 ft. [178.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.6 ft. [14.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100,050 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.4 tons [58.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:67.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$2,756,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201567.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood100050
February 201367.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood96710
March 201168.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood98900
April 200967.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood99840
June 200767.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood100890
August 200568.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood94810
August 200372.3Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood99840
September 200172.2Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood101870
February 200073.2Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood84560
February 199863.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood92240
September 199564.4Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood89230
August 199365.4Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood79220
November 199163.2Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood99770